Thursday, April 16, 2009
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Treatment of Demo Officials Vs. Repub. Offficials
Good blog on liberal bias evident in treatment of a Democratic Official when involved in a scandal vs that of a Republican official : http://vocalminority.typepad.com/blog/liberal_media_bias/
Saturday, April 4, 2009
O'Reilly 100 months #1 for a Reason
I don't always agree with Bill O'Reilly but I do think he is one of the most fair and balanced Journalist. He is branded "conservative" by the Left because anything in the middle appears "conservative" to them. There are not many Journalist left today. Bill is one of them. Here is a excerpt from an article in Newsmax:
Asked how he thinks the mainstream media have been covering the Obama presidency, O'eilly said: I despise, and you can put that in capital letters, what many in the media are doing right now. I think they're corrupt. I think they'e dishonest. I think they'e ill-informed. I don't want anybody to have any doubts about where I stand on that.�
O'eilly had particularly harsh words for NBC and its MSNBC cable station.
I don't have any beef with ABC News or CBS News,he told B&C programming editor Marisa Guthrie.
I think they try. I think they're run mostly by liberal people. Their agenda is somewhat tempered. I don't even have a beef with CNN. They're what they were 20 years ago.
NBC is corrupt top to bottom. They say, oh, it's only MSNBC. No it's not, it's across the board.
Asked how he thinks the mainstream media have been covering the Obama presidency, O'eilly said: I despise, and you can put that in capital letters, what many in the media are doing right now. I think they're corrupt. I think they'e dishonest. I think they'e ill-informed. I don't want anybody to have any doubts about where I stand on that.�
O'eilly had particularly harsh words for NBC and its MSNBC cable station.
I don't have any beef with ABC News or CBS News,he told B&C programming editor Marisa Guthrie.
I think they try. I think they're run mostly by liberal people. Their agenda is somewhat tempered. I don't even have a beef with CNN. They're what they were 20 years ago.
NBC is corrupt top to bottom. They say, oh, it's only MSNBC. No it's not, it's across the board.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Why JUST Cramer? Why not Frank & Dodd?
Jim Cramer has come under attack by the Main Street Left Wing Media because he dared to say something negative about Obama. Cramer blasted Obama for all the negativity the he has included in his messages to the people and the signing of the Pork filled Stimulus package which has put negative pressure on the Stock Market. Everyone who has a 401k, IRA or similar retirement account with investments in stocks has been impacted by the decline in the Market. The majority of these people are not "rich". They may have $10,000 to $20,000 in their funds. Funds that were $20,000 to $40,000 6 months ago. Cramer was correctly pointing out that Bama has indirectly contributed to the loss of billions of dollars by millions of Americans. The Media has launched an attack on Cramer.
Why is there not an outrage in the Media about the likes of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi Harry Reid and Maxine Waters? Journalism has been replaced with Ideology.
Why is there not an outrage in the Media about the likes of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi Harry Reid and Maxine Waters? Journalism has been replaced with Ideology.
Monday, March 9, 2009
Who's covering the Climate Change Convention?
Have you heard anything in the Main street media about The 2009 International Conference on Climate Change taking place this week in New York? I haven't. I wonder why? Could it be that Scientist there will actually be debating whether or not the Earth is warming and it is not a rally for the Left who see the issue as a political one versus a scientific one? You see if the earth is not really warming and the US Citizen Drones begin to understand that, then how will the Left be able to use the movement to take control of their lives? How can the Left Wing Media afford to report on an event where scientist are making statements like those of Dr. Richard Lindzen, who has been Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at MIT for over 25 years, was one of the keynote speakers on the opening day. He said global warming hysteria is more about a political agenda and has nothing to do with science. How problematic for the LWM to report on a event where respected Scientist have objective views? After all Al Gore, the inventor of the internet, is now the expert on global warming.
Dr. Lindzen went on to say: "I think [there is] one point you should notice as one discusses the science, and that is that global warming alarm -- as far as I can tell -- has always been a political movement, a highly organized one," Lindzen observed. "And although it took me a while to realize this, opposing it has always been an uphill battle."
The MIT professor, one of the world's most respected atmospheric physicists, said that many of his good friends and colleagues have subscribed to global warming alarmism because they either fear for their jobs or see it as a way to get funding for scientific projects. He also discussed the use of supposed "climate models," and quipped that as scientists debate intelligent design, climate models are an example of "unintelligent design."
Dr. Michael Coffman is the CEO of Sovereignty International, a U.N. watchdog organization. During an interview at the conference with OneNewsNow, he explained that the basis of his skepticism regarding global warming comes from research he himself has conducted.
"During the 1980s and early 1990s, I lead a multimillion-dollar research effort on global warming and found that the data that was being collected just didn't support the hypothesis that man was causing global warming," says Coffman.
Why are the major media organizaions not reporting on this? Oh where have all the true Journalist gone?
Dr. Lindzen went on to say: "I think [there is] one point you should notice as one discusses the science, and that is that global warming alarm -- as far as I can tell -- has always been a political movement, a highly organized one," Lindzen observed. "And although it took me a while to realize this, opposing it has always been an uphill battle."
The MIT professor, one of the world's most respected atmospheric physicists, said that many of his good friends and colleagues have subscribed to global warming alarmism because they either fear for their jobs or see it as a way to get funding for scientific projects. He also discussed the use of supposed "climate models," and quipped that as scientists debate intelligent design, climate models are an example of "unintelligent design."
Dr. Michael Coffman is the CEO of Sovereignty International, a U.N. watchdog organization. During an interview at the conference with OneNewsNow, he explained that the basis of his skepticism regarding global warming comes from research he himself has conducted.
"During the 1980s and early 1990s, I lead a multimillion-dollar research effort on global warming and found that the data that was being collected just didn't support the hypothesis that man was causing global warming," says Coffman.
Why are the major media organizaions not reporting on this? Oh where have all the true Journalist gone?
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Racists
Some in Congress are calling for re-institution of the "Fairness" Doctrine. They think it is necessary because Conservative Talk Radio presents an unbalanced presentation of the facts. They are not satisfied that 85% of the media today has a liberal bias. If a conservative had made the racist and elitist statements made by the two progressive government officials in the following video you would definitely hear and read about the outrage in all the "fair" media. I didn't hear anything about this until I received an email about it. Democracy and capitalism are under siege!
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
